KQM | Genshin Impact - breakpoints-for-2inst2wt-vs-4tfcw

Yuehai Ticketing SecretaryBOTJun 22, 2021 2:18 PM

@ProfHugo | ⚡🍌🍑 vs 🔥🐔🍑 - breakpoints-for-2Inst2WT-vs-4TF/CW As an author, It is your responsibility to complete the ticket - Take advice constructively - NO disrespectful behavior - The ticket will be scrapped if: No activity > 1 week or open for > 1 mo. - When done, type $close

Theory/Finding/Bug: Title of your submission Evidence: Explanations with calculations and/or Youtube/Imgur proofs Significance: Conclusion

ProfHugo | ⚡🍌🍑 vs 🔥🐔🍑Jun 22, 2021 2:28 PM

Finding: For transformative reactions, +80 EM is better than 4TF/CW bonus at <=490 EM without set bonus, while +160 EM is better than 4TF/CW bonus at <=1498 EM without set bonus Evidence: - 4TF/CW provides a flat, additive bonus to the total % increase in the formula. - The bonus provided 80/160 EM follows a hyperbolic decay as total EM increases. - At 0 <= EM without set bonus <= 490 EM, 80 additional EM provides >=40% increase to the damage of a transformative reaction. - At 0 <= EM without set bonus <= 1498 EM, 160 additional EM provides >=40% increase to the damage of a transformative reaction. Desmos sheet for visualization/calculations: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/7igtgtirot Significance: For characters building around triggering transformative reactions, if they do not utilize any other parts of the 4p set bonus provided by 4CW (vape/melt boost, pyro% increase) or 4TF (cool down reduction, elec% increase), then 2p Instructor and/or 2p WT may provide a larger boost to damage than the former two.(edited)

Transformative set bonus breakpoints